Family Law

Can I Change the Locks After We Separate?

Separation is often a challenging and emotionally charged time in a person’s life, usually accompanied by significant decisions regarding living arrangements. One common question that arises during this period is whether it is legally permissible to change the locks on a property after separation. Unfortunately, it is difficult to give a simple answer to this question as it depends on a number of factors, including whether the property is rented or owned, and whose name is on the relevant paperwork. Understanding the law regarding the occupancy of a property is crucial in navigating this situation within the bounds of the law.

Leased Property

When the property is leased or rented, all tenants listed on the lease have the right to live in the property during the term. However, in this situation, the paperwork is largely irrelevant, as tenants are generally prohibited from changing the locks without the landlord’s permission, even in the context of a separation. As such, altering locks without proper authorisation could lead to eviction or breach of lease terms.

This does not mean that a person in a leased property must continue to reside with someone until the end of the lease, especially in situations involving domestic or family violence. In such situations, it is wise to speak to a tenant advisory service in the relevant state or territory, as there are options to help tenants break leases to escape unsafe situations.

Owned Property

Joint owners have equal rights to access and occupy a jointly owned property unless and until a legal agreement or court order dictates otherwise. Therefore, if both partners have joint ownership of the property, neither party should unilaterally change the locks without the other’s consent.

By contrast, in cases where one party solely owns the property, that owner generally has the right to change the locks, denying access to the other party. However, even if one party is the sole owner, changing the locks without prior discussion can be viewed as an aggressive move and may escalate tensions during separation negotiations.

In addition, changing the locks, even with full legal authority as the sole legal owner, may be subject to challenge in family court proceedings. If there are children involved, locking a co-parent out of the home can have significant emotional and psychological consequences for the children. As the court prioritises the best interests of the children, in most cases it is important to not take unilateral steps that will disrupt the relationship between the children and the other parent.   

What Orders Can the Court Make?

When disputes over the occupancy of a property arise after separation, parties can seek court intervention to resolve the issue. The court has the authority to make various orders, depending on the circumstances. For instance, the court can grant an exclusive occupancy order, allowing one party to remain in the property while the other is required to vacate, regardless of the legal ownership of the property. This order is typically issued to ensure the stability and well-being of children or the safety of one of the parties.

In contrast, the court can also issue a non-removal order, preventing either party from removing the other from the property. This order aims to maintain the status quo and protect both parties’ rights until a final resolution is reached. Moreover, if one party has been locked out of a jointly owned property, the court can order financial compensation or reimbursement for expenses incurred as a result of being denied access. Finally, the court may order the sale of the property and the division of proceeds between the parties, effectively ending their co-ownership.

It is important to note that obtaining court orders requires legal proceedings, and both parties will have the opportunity to present their case and provide evidence of their respective positions. The court will consider factors such as the best interests of children, financial circumstances, and safety concerns when making these orders. However, this is likely to be a difficult and time-consuming process and may incur substantial legal fees.

Seek Assistance

Navigating property issues after separation in Australia can be complex and emotionally charged. While changing the locks after separation may be legally permissible in certain situations, it is essential to consider the implications and consequences of such actions, especially in cases involving joint ownership, children, or leased properties.

If in doubt, you should seek legal advice and explore mediation or negotiation options to resolve disputes amicably whenever possible. When disputes cannot be resolved privately, turning to the court system for orders regarding property occupancy is an option.

This is general information only and you should obtain professional advice relevant to your circumstances. If you or someone you know wants more information or needs help or advice, please contact us on (08) 8155 5322 or email [email protected].

How Mediation Can Help Resolve Your Family Law Matter

Mediation is a valuable and widely utilised method for resolving legal matters. This alternative form of dispute resolution is particularly valuable when it is desirable to maintain a relationship with the other party after the dispute, as is often the case in family law matters. Mediation offers a collaborative and less adversarial approach to addressing family law issues related to separation, divorce, parenting, property division, and more. This article explores how mediation works, when it can be used, the benefits it offers, what to do when it does not work or may not be appropriate, and how to prepare for family law mediation.

How Does Mediation Work?

Mediation is a structured process in which an impartial third party, known as a mediator, assists parties in reaching agreements on various legal issues. Typically, there are several different stages of mediation.

The first stage is the initial meeting between the parties and the mediator. The mediator will explain their role in facilitating communication and negotiation and describe the mediation process. The mediator may also use this opportunity to ask each party to outline their understanding of the issues in dispute.

The next stage of the mediation is information sharing. The mediator will prompt the parties to share relevant information, documents, and concerns about the issues. Transparency and open communication are crucial for effective mediation. For this reason, mediation is often undertaken on a “no prejudice” basis, meaning that the parties can freely share information to try and reach a solution, without this information being used against them in any later court action.

After the key information has been shared by both parties, the negotiation stage will begin. The mediator will guide discussions and help the parties to explore possible solutions. Skilled mediators use various techniques to foster communication and encourage compromise. This stage is usually the longest in duration and may take several hours or an entire day to try and reach a solution. 

Of course, the final stage of the process – the agreement – does not occur in every case. However, if the parties do manage to reach an agreement on one or more issues, the mediator will assist in documenting the agreement.

Parties who were not represented by a lawyer during the mediation will often seek independent legal advice at this stage to review the agreement before finalising it. Once the agreement is reviewed and accepted, it may be presented to the court for formalisation as a legally enforceable agreement.

When Can Mediation Be Used in a Family Law Matter?

Mediation can be used for a range of family law matters but is mostly used to negotiate parenting and property disputes.  Even if mediation does not result in a complete resolution for these matters, it often helps narrow down the issues in dispute, making court proceedings more focused and efficient.

Mediation is not only useful when there is a conflict, it can also be a good environment for separated co-parents to create parenting plans, make decisions about parenting, and agree on how to parent their children. Even parents with otherwise good co-parenting relationships may find mediation useful when dealing with some issues. For instance, co-parents who struggle to agree on one or two matters where each feel strongly (such as whether or not to raise their child in a particular faith) may benefit from the presence of a neutral third party guiding them to a compromise that works for both. 

Separated parties can also use mediation to negotiate the division of assets and liabilities, including the family home, finances, investments, and superannuation. Mediation can be particularly helpful when a property settlement involves complex issues. For instance, if a main asset in the property pool is a family business that must continue to operate to retain its value, dividing this asset may require complex negotiation to enable a fair and equitable outcome. Mediation can also allow discussion of issues such as spousal support, especially when this forms part of a broader agreement about the division of the property pool.

The Benefits of Mediation

Mediation offers numerous benefits. Perhaps most importantly, parties in a mediation have greater control over the outcome compared to other options such as applying to the courts for a decision about their family dispute. This control can give the parties a sense of empowerment and ownership of the solution, as they have actively participated in crafting an agreement that works for their unique situation.

The collaborative nature of mediation can also help to reduce animosity and improve post-separation relationships. This is particularly important for co-parents, who will potentially need to continue to work cooperatively for many years. Because mediation prioritises the best interests of the children and promotes child-focused solutions, it is consistent with the approach of the courts to parenting disputes. Of course, even in family cases where no children are involved, most parties will benefit from participating in a system which is less adversarial and inflammatory than traditional litigation.

Mediation often leads to a quicker resolution compared to lengthy court processes, which can take months or even years. As a result, mediation is generally more cost-effective than litigating in court, as it typically requires fewer legal fees and court-related expenses. Mediation is also more flexible than litigation, as it allows the parties to decide which issues are important and need to be explored.

Finally, as mediation sessions are confidential, they generally foster open and honest communication between parties. For some parties, the confidential nature of this process is of the utmost importance, as the issues included in a court case are a matter of public record.

When Mediation Doesn’t Work or May Not Be Appropriate

While mediation is effective in many family law cases, it may not always be appropriate or successful in every situation. For instance, if there is a significant power imbalance between the parties, mediation may not provide a fair forum for negotiation. In particular, mediation is often not safe in situations involving domestic violence, intimidation, or threats. Similarly, in cases where urgent decisions are needed, such as child safety concerns, immediate court action may be necessary. In such cases, seeking legal protection should be the priority.

In addition, mediation requires both parties to be committed to the process and willing to compromise. If one or both parties are unwilling to negotiate in good faith, mediation may not be productive. Finally, in some highly complex financial or legal matters, mediation may not be the most suitable vehicle for resolution. Such cases may require the expertise of a family lawyer and, potentially, court intervention.

Preparing for Your Family Law Mediation

It is advisable for all parties to seek legal advice prior to mediation. Even in cases when lawyers will not be at the mediation, it is still wise for each party to consult with a family lawyer before mediation to understand their rights, responsibilities, and the potential legal outcomes.

Both parties should ensure that they collect all relevant documents, financial records, and information about the issues to be discussed. A solution is much more likely to be reached on the day if exact figures and facts can be provided.

There is also emotional and mental preparation required prior to a mediation. A successful mediation is more likely when the parties have prepared emotionally for the process, understanding that mediation may involve difficult discussions and compromises. Each party should identify their goals and priorities for mediation, including what outcomes they hope to achieve (the “best case” scenario) and the outcome that they can accept (the “worst case” scenario).

If you or someone you know wants more information or needs help or advice, please contact us on (08) 8155 5322 or email [email protected].

Attending Compulsory Family Dispute Resolution – what to expect

Separating couples should make reasonable attempts to agree on the future living arrangements, care and responsibility for their children. The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) provides that, unless there are extenuating circumstances, dispute resolution is compulsory if agreement cannot be reached, prior to bringing an application for parenting orders to the family law courts.

Divorce, de factos and superannuation splitting

Once a couple is separated, their superannuation (super) is treated as property under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) and the value of the couples’ super benefits will be taken into account when determining a property settlement. Laws regarding super splitting apply to both married and de facto couples.

Super is held in trust and this type of arrangement differs from other types of property – there are rules that govern when a party is able to access their super funds.

Parenting orders for non-parents – who can apply?

A parenting order is not only designed to apply to parents or guardians of a child, but non-parents may also apply for parenting orders to be able to spend time with, or care for a child.

The Family Law Act allows a grandparent, or any other person concerned for the child’s care, welfare, or development to apply for a parenting order.

Social media and family law – Just don’t do it!

Social media – Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat and the like – can be a lot of fun and have become an accepted part of modern life.  Many of us use such forms of electronic communication to share the exciting, as well as the banal events in our lives, to express our views and to stay in touch with loved ones.  But what happens when people going through a relationship breakdown take to social media? Usually little good comes of it, and sometimes quite a lot of bad can result.